Who are the Wikileaks Party preferencing?

Who are the Wikileaks Party preferencing?

Screen Shot 2013-08-18 at 4.17.48 PM

The federal election is in a few weeks and while there has been so much focus on Kevin Rudd and Tony Abbott, don’t forget there is a Senate election.

Unlike the House, the Senate elections have been traditionally dominated with minor parties thanks to its very unique voting system. And this year’s election has seen a record-breaking number of minor parties being represented in this year’s election – namely the Wikileaks Party and Pirate Party.

So, what is the unique feature? On your Senate ballot box, you have two options – you can vote “above” the line or “below” it. Voting below that line means that you will need to write all your preferences – from 1 to whatever number of candidates (NSW, for instance, has 102 candidates), similar to the House election. This, however, is often a pain and many opt to vote above the line, since you only need to mark in one box with your first preference. The downside is that the party then gets to choose where your preferences go.

And that’s why I’m writing this post – this is basically a quick way to find out where your preferences are going once the AEC calculates the votes. If your party has been “eliminated”, then your votes will be redistributed to the second preference, then third, then fourth, etc. until six candidates have met a certain quota.

First up is the Wikileaks Party – the party founded by Julian Assange, who is also running for a Senate seat in Victoria. Where are their party preferences are going, if you vote above the line?

Note: unless specified, when a party name is listed then it is safe to assume the preferences are following the party’s order.


In Victoria, the Wikileaks Party has offered their second-party preferences to the Pirate Party; however, when looking at the list, it appears that many of the preferences are to maximise the minor parties chances – well, the ones that align to their political views – in not being eliminated if the Wikileaks Party does.

In terms of the three main parties – The Greens are preferenced first, in 24th place. This is followed by Labor, then the Coalition.

Group Party
1 AA The Wikileaks Party
2 AL Pirate Party
3 Y Animal Justice Party
4 AC Sex Party
5 B Liberal Democrats
6 AF Drug Law Reform
7 D Senator Online (Internet Voting Bills/Issues)
8 F Help End Marijuana Prohibition (HEMP) Party
9 I Secular Party of Australia
10 AB Australian Democrats
11 U Stop CSG
12 X The Australian Republics
13 AG Bullet Train for Australia
14 UG Ungrouped Independents (Gunter, L; Morrison, D)
15 R Australian Independents
16 K Bank Reform
17 AK Socialist Equality Party
18 P Building Australia Party
19 Z Australian Motoring Enthusiast Party
20 L Stable Population Party
21 M Smokers Rights
22 Q Australian Voice Party
23 N Australian Fishing & Lifestyle Party
24 S The Greens
25 AD Australian Labor Party
26 E Liberal/The Nationals
27 G Family First
28 H Country Alliance
29 V Katter’s Australia Party
30 W Palmer United Party
31 AJ Nicholls, B; Nicholls, K; Webb, P
32 T Toscano, J; Matthews, B
33 AE Stop The Greens
34 AH Australian Christians
35 O Shooters and Fishers
36 AM DLP Democratic Labour
37 J No Carbon Tax Climate Sceptics
38 C One Nation
39 A Rise Up Australia Party
40 AI Citizens Electoral Council

New South Wales

Similar to Victoria, The Wikileaks Party’s preferences appear to maximise the minor parties chances in still being in the running when the Wikileaks Party is eliminated. Unlike in Victoria, the Pirate Party is third, with the Future Party second. The Sex Party and Stop CSG round out the top 5 party preferences.

However, interesting thing to note is that the Shooters and Fishers and extreme far-right Australia First parties have been preferenced before the Greens in NSW. This obviously caused a Twitter storm. Wikileaks have said that this was an administrative error, and did not do a deal with the Shooters and Fishers party.

“In allocating preferences between 53 other parties or groups in NSW some administrative errors occurred, as has been the case with some other parties. The overall decision as to preferences was a democratically made decision of the full National Council of the party,” it said in a statement posted on Twitter.

“According to the National Coucil (sic) decision The Shooters & Fishers and the Australia First party should have been below Greens, Labor, Liberal.”

Also interesting thing to note is that the Wikileaks Party preferenced Family First and the DLP ahead of the Liberals and Nationals. Another administrative mistake? I’ll take them on their word.

Group Party
1 I The Wikileaks Party
2 K Future Party
3 AO Pirate Party
4 P Sex Party
5 AK Stop CSG
6 AF Australian Democrats
7 G Help End Marijuana Prohibition (HEMP) Party
8 A Liberal Democrats
9 AA Animal Justice Party
10 U United Australia Party
11 E Voluntary Euthanasia Party
12 AD Drug Law Reform
13 AC Australian Independents
14 X Bullet Train for Australia
15 O Australian Voice
16 T Building Australia Party
17 AG Want, T; O’Toole, D
18 AB Australia First Party
19 AE Socialist Equality Party
20 F Whalan, A; Cooper, P
21 AL Australian Republics
22 D Senator Online (Internet Voting Bills/Issues)
23 H Carers Alliance
24 AJ Shooters and Fishers
25 Q Australian Fishing and Lifestyle Party
26 AN Non-Custodial Parents Party (Equal Parenting)
27 AQ Australian Motoring Enthusiast Party
28 R The Greens
29 M Labor
30 AH Family First
31 C Democratic Labour Party (DLP)
32 Y Liberals and Nationals
33 Z Australian Protectionist Party
34 AM Socialist Alternative
35 S Palmer United Party
36 V Stop The Greens
37 W Smokers Rights
38 AI Stable Population Party
39 AP Secular Party of Australia
40 N Katter’s Australia Party
41 B No Carbon Tax Climate Sceptics
42  L Christian Democratic Party (Fred Nile Group)
43  J Rise Up Australia Party
44  UG Ungrouped Independents (Poulsen, R; Ash, D; Nathan, S; La Mela, J)
45  AR One Nation

Western Australia

If you thought the New South Wales Group Voting Ticket was off the scale, you haven’t looked at the Western Australian one for the Wikileaks Party. It is a very extreme oddity. The Wikileaks Party have preferenced the Nationals above the Greens – unlike in NSW and VIC where they are below. However, both The Greens and the Nationals are above a lot of the minor parties – so the tactic of just filling up the minor parties’ votes does not apply in WA.

There is also another extreme oddity where the only Ungrouped candidate has been preferenced above Labor. Why is this an oddity? The candidate in the Ungrouped section is a member of One Nation. Wikileaks Party preferences in NSW and Victoria have put them at the bottom – so it’s weird to see why One Nation has been given such a position in Western Australia. However, by the looks at the ticket – it might be a mute point since their preferences will likely flow to The Nationals.

The Wikileaks Party has not given an official statement in relation to the Western Australia situation – but it seems that the ticket goes against the full Council’s decision (see NSW statement above).

Group Party
1 L Wikileaks Party
2 X Australian Sports Party
3 T Animal Justice Party
4 R Australian Democrats
5 U The Nationals
6 S The Greens (WA)
7 E Socialist Equality Party
8 M Katter’s Australian Party
9 D Help End Marijuana Prohibition (HEMP) Party
10 B Liberal Democrats
11 K Australian Independents
12 W Australian Motoring Enthusiast Party
13 UG Ungrouped Independents / One Nation (Farmer, R)
14 V Australian Fishing and Lifestyle Party
15 Z Australian Labor Party
16 J Secular Party of Australia
17 C Australian Christians
18 I Sex Party
19 H Australian Voice
20 AA Liberal
21 F Palmer United Party
22 N Family First
23 Q Stop the Greens
24 P Stable Population Party
25 O No Carbon Tax Climate Sceptics
26 Y Rise Up Australia Party
27 A Smokers Rights
28 G Shooters and Fishers

Understandably, many people – especially in NSW and WA – are extremely pissed at the Wikileaks Party’s preferences. As stated many times, there has been a record number of candidates at this year’s Senate election. There are 110 candidates in NSW, 97 in Victoria, and 62 in WA – all vying for six Senate seats for their respective states.

Those numbers are really important when you realise that the only way to avoid the bad decisions in the Group Voting Tickets is to vote “below the line”. That essentially means that you have to fill in your preferences – like the House ballot – of all the candidates.

Wikileaks Party members and supporters can opt to use the below the line method and vote against the party’s decisions, but realistically they will not. Because the number of candidates is just too large to preference all of them – especially in NSW, where you have 110 candidates.

Share Tweet Send
You've successfully subscribed to TechGeek
Great! Next, complete checkout for full access to TechGeek
Welcome back! You've successfully signed in
Success! Your account is fully activated, you now have access to all content.